Lichess vs chess com reddit

Lichess vs chess com reddit

There are a lot of Chess 2 versions, but finally, we have our answer on which version is the best. Congratulation to 5D Chess with Multiverse Time Travel for winning the heart of r/AnarchyChess! 1 / 6. First, we have our winner. 521.That makes a huge difference. That means a score of 2100 on lichess is "1.4 times better than average" (which is an oversimplification of how Elo is really calculated and what it represents) whereas a score of 1800 of chesscom is "1.5 times better than average", which is a very minor difference. Share.Lichess uses the better model (defined by how accurate it predicts results). In a nutshell Lichess will be higher until rating 2100 or so. After that Lichess will be lower than chess.com. It doesn't use a better model, apparently, after a few games, you get 1 point for a win, 0 for a draw, and -1 for a loss.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com Vs Lichess. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment HowBen • Additional comment actions ...Coming from someone whos played thousands of of games on chess.com and hundreds on lichess (2 different accounts per website) lichess is more casual, and is free. They offer free lessons and tactics. With chess.com the player base is bigger, they offer much more efficient and a wide variety of learning tools.Time parameters are also categorized little differently. Lichess considers 10min Rapid and Chesscom considers it blitz. But the all the people I know personally have a significantly …I know on lichess and chess.com the elo levels are not distributed at the same skill level, with what I've seen being lichess is around 400 points or so inflated compared to chess.com. However, after around a month and a half playing and sitting comfortably at 1050 or so on chess.com, I'm struggling on lichess to break past 1200.Chess.com has excellent learning material for new players, and I find its user interface more intuitive in many places vs. lichess.org. Chess24.com has good coverage of the chess world, but for playing and learning... meh. Pros: Completely free and open source, good interface for web, great community.The engine will take you through your mistakes and blunders and you can try to correct them. Its a lot less intuitive and helpful than the coach feature on chess.com but its something. Lichess could be a lot better from a UI/UX perspective but im guessing they are operating with less than 5% of the resources chess.com has.Related Topics. Chess.com's puzzles are somewhat easier because they're usually more thematic, which is because (I believe) they're curated. Lichess puzzles are fully automated in their generation, so the puzzles often feel computerish and many lines have insane refutations to calculate just for the computer to play a completely different move.I've experienced the entire range between 900 and 2100 on Lichess and used to get substantially more toxicity. Now it's a very rare occurence. Yea but people lower rated (I'm 1300 chess.com and 1600 Lichess) don't really play IRL. Especially since the chess boom last year.Lichess is superior due to the far greater amount of functions compared to chess.com's free version. Everything is free on lichess and I like the interface better. The only thing I will say is that I like that chess.com supports Swiss tournaments, which lichess does not (arena tournaments stress me out, and I don't like streaks or Berserk).For each opening you can see number of games played, win rate, opponent's average elo and you can even see stats for all the variations of the opening. You can use it to analyze which openings you're good at, and which openings you can improve at. You can search for your friend's stats, or your favourite player's.At low Elo, the difference tends to be very large. Some students of mine are around 1000 on Lichess and 300-400 on chessdotcom. The difference gets progressively smaller as the Elo increases, in my experience at around 1600-1700 the Elo are equivalent across sites. Above 2000, I personally feel Lichess players are stronger, but I have little ... The percentile is calculated differently, our better formulated the term activate chess player is. 'All' streamers play on chess.com because they think it is the best website they have have a reward program. So newer players who watch a video on YT will likely more go to chess.com and they will stick there. Because of that, newer player friends will also go to chess.com and stick there.The interface difference certainly affects gameplay, I play much worse on chess.com. There is no actual way to convert ratings because both use different rating systems and initial rating but in general chess.com rating lags behind lichess ratings till 2000~ and then they are pretty close mostly.TIL about the Mikhail Chigorin Club - A list of players who defeated the reigning World Champion in a classical game. 266. 73. r/chess. Join. • 5 days ago. Nervous to play in-person. Would like some direction. 396.I previously played chess.con for most of my years of playing chess however I feel with the rising popularity of chess and the fact that new players will gravitate towards chess.com or lichess I think it is important to support the smaller site. Chess.com has enough money whereas lichess runs on donationsOnly a certain subset of chess players will have FIDE ratings, and they may systematically differ from other chess players. Heteroscedasticity. Even without the residual plots, it looks like the regression line does a terrible job at predicting FIDE scores for blitz scores in the range [1500, 2250].It's much easier to understand. 1400 on lichess means that you approximately better than 30% of the use rbase. Now you can say, chess.com has stronger classical players so you would expect a rating below 30 percentile on chess.com which would be way below 1200, I think.GM Alireza Firouzja is 3115 Chess.com blitz and 2750 FIDE blitz. (I rounded the numbers to nearest 5.) Also, 50th percentile on Chess.com is just around 1200 (somewhere a smidge above that), while it's 1500 on Lichess. What this means is that at 1200 Chess.com, a player is better than roughly 50% of Chess.com players - and at 1500 Lichess, a ...On desktop computer, the only answer is both, chesscom isn't buggy at all there. com for better pieces and board styles, premoves, news and forums, 960 tourneys. lichess for all other tourneys, unlimited analysis, unlimited puzzles, and a great 3D wooden set to practice OTB. [deleted] • 3 yr. ago.Hey, everyone, got this mate on accident earlier. Still pretty new to chess (been playing on and off for about a year now) and I’ve been exclusively playing on Chess.com. Rated ~600 in rapid but have been really enjoying 3 min blitz games recently (rated 200-300). Since I joined this sub I’ve seen a lot of mentions of Lichess. I play a lot of 3|0 blitz on both platforms. I just broke 1200 on Lichess and so fairly well for the most part. I'm rarely flustered and have a lot of fun games. Chess.com is a totally different story. Trying to break 700 still, getting close but always end up dropping to 600.I have achieved both 2300+ blitz ratings, on chess.com and lichess and I feel like achieving it on lichess feels more like I achieved 1000 rating or something ( "walk in the park") feels very easy , without much trying or stress, whether if I try to do the same on chess.com feels more like an endless torture back and forth.You are correct that lichess and chess.com use different ratings, however that doesn't mean we cannot compare ratings at all. To summarize my answer on …You are correct that lichess and chess.com use different ratings, however that doesn't mean we cannot compare ratings at all. To summarize my answer on …It's much easier to understand. 1400 on lichess means that you approximately better than 30% of the use rbase. Now you can say, chess.com has stronger classical players so you would expect a rating below 30 percentile on chess.com which would be way below 1200, I think.On chess.com, they don't offer that. You have to flip back and forth between screens if you want to see all three. I see chess.com as great for the newer players, and Lichess as being better once you hit say 800 on Chess.com. Note that the rating system is different, chess.com is about 300-400 points below Lichess.Chess.com uses the Glicko-1 algorithm with an initial rating of 1200. Lichess uses the Glicko-2 algorithm with an initial rating of 1500. Neither of them uses the Elo algorithm ( not ELO - it's not an abbreviation). Furthermore, it doesn't make sense to compare the ratings even if both sites used the same system, as they have different player ...I definitely agree about the ratings though. My ICC Rating is 1250 and my lichess rating is 1700. I cannot comment on Chess.com, because I haven't played there in a few years. Gixx • 8 yr. ago. I have very little experience (1100 games on FICS - 5 2 blitz) and 80 games on lichess (15 2 time). I'm rated 1000 on FICS, and 1420 on lichess. 9 comments. Best. 1850 chesscom would be like ~1600 USCF and like ~1400-1500 FIDE or so. Source: Lichess 2050 (peak 2150) getting 1700 PR in OTB blitz events and being happy because I had a great tournament. I had my first OTB tournament last month. I'm around 1400 chesscom blitz but registered for the open section.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess and chess.com vs US Chess and StLCC. lichess and chess.com have stop all cooperation with both US Chess and STLCC over there handling of allegations of sexual misconduct by titled players. What surprise me is that no chess commentator on youtube has made any comment ...I just checked some of my old unrated games and no, they don't appear in the Lichess opening book - HOWEVER, they would exist in the downloadable full database via https://database.lichess.org. I wonder if Ding's team even knew how powerful and accessible the Lichess opening book is?I liked lichess cause it used to be way snappier than chess.com. I don't know why every redesign makes has to make a site more bloated, same with the new reddit which I will never use. It's not quite as slow as chess.com yet but it's like another step in the wrong direction.I don't think trying diamond out for a month would hurt anything, I'm doing the same because the insight and coaching feature is a nice addition. If you're experienced and the coaching insights don't help then yeah it's probably not worth it, but if you play a lot and are wanting to learn then it's justifiable. r/chess.Also, please, be kind in your replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.On chess.com I got to 1064 in blitz putting me at around 60th percentile. On lichess a 1300 only puts me around 25th percentile. Are the rankings…Post Match Thread - We have a new Champion! Fide World Chess Championship 2023 Nepo vs Ding. 1.4K. 1.2K. r/chess. Join.Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Go to AnarchyChess r/AnarchyChess • by FBS369. Chess.com vs. lichess.org Chess Battle. Day 1: lichess.org is white (or pink) & Chess.com is black. There are no rules at all! White (or pink) to move! Related Topics Chess ...5. unwettermaschine • 8 mo. ago. lichess uses a different rating system. I‘m not aware of the specifics myself but the initial rating for a new account on lichess is 1500, whereas on chess.com it‘s 1200 (or at least it was when I played there a long time ago). So yeah, lichess ratings are always going to be a few hundred points higher ...My son has a chesskids.com ranking of 1000, and we made a deal that if he reached rank 800 on chess.com, he'd get a reward. He says he prefers chesskids.com because he thinks there's a lot of cheaters on chess.com. I believe he's making an excuse as far as the chess.com cheaters are concerned. Likely, if he were better, he'd probably rank up ...You don't compare the number, you compare the percentile in the pool. If you are top 10% on lichess, you will probably be top 10% on chess.com. Slightly lower on lichess though, at least in blitz. The pool of blitz players on lichess is significantly stronger. Most casual players google "chess" and end up on chess dot com which makes the pool ... Both lichess and chess.com ratings have been stable compared to each other and OTB ratings in the past year. New for 2023, I split out FIDE ratings for players in the United States since we receive a lot of questions about USCF vs. FIDE ratings. If we look at active and inactive players in the United States, FIDE ratings are 100-200 points lower.On chess.com, they don't offer that. You have to flip back and forth between screens if you want to see all three. I see chess.com as great for the newer players, and Lichess as being better once you hit say 800 on Chess.com. Note that the rating system is different, chess.com is about 300-400 points below Lichess.It's literally all they have to offer now as lichess.org is a superior site in every way. Let's not forget that chess.crap was founded by a guy named Erik Allebest, who knows nothing at all about chess (yes that's actually true!) but was a business major who started the site in order to make money.Miscellaneous. I am just a newb (barely 900 rated on Lichess 5 minute blitz), but when I'm at work sometimes I will quickly get in 3 or 4 games of anonymous 3 minute blitz on Chess.com. I notice that when I go to quick pairing on Lichess, I get absolutely crushed, whereas Chess.com, the beginner arena is much easier.I threw together a quick and dirty (and ugly) chart because I was curious: Lichess vs Chess.com blitz ratings. Basically, Lichess doesn't report ratings under 800 (and they only have 8 people at that level) but that is already the 25th percentile for chess.com. 1850 is 90th percentile for Chess.com but only 73rd percentile for Lichess. 2250 Lichess is 97.5 percentile, and 97.5 percentile on ...It's actually 3 times as many people play rapid than blitz on chess.com, 28 mil vs about 10 mil. 10+0 is the most popular time format by far. With that said both pools have an average rating around 800. So for the OP I'd just guess that they're better at longer time formats.This. Lichess has written an explanation of the different rating systems. Here is someone trying explore which rating in one system is equivalent to a rating in another (so chess.com vs lichess, chess.com vs FIDE, etc).. On average I would guess Lichess has a slightly stronger pool of players, but that is because chess.com is most likely the first site beginners find.Hi everyone. I've been playing against the computer for years using chess.com, but have started to try lichess given the overwhelming popularity on this sub. I find it infuriating. Please help. I love the mobile board on chess.com, because I can easily hop into analysis to criticize what tactics I'm not seeing. Is this feature available on lichess? You lost rating because lichess doesn't see mate in 2 a solution if there is a mate in 1 available, since the mate in 1 is better. That's the only reason you didn't get this puzzle. If you played any of the mate in 1s in this quzzle, they would all count as solutions because they are equivalent. Chizzle76 • 6 mo. ago.Stockfish on Lichess vs GUI I've recently started using an engine to go over my games, and I'm wondering what the advantages are to using Stockfish on Lichess or some GUI like Arena or Lucas. To me, Lichess seems very good since it analyzes the game live as you go through the moves, and you can try out other sidelines and it automatically ...Lichess and chess.com vs US Chess and StLCC. lichess and chess.com have stop all cooperation with both US Chess and STLCC over there handling of allegations of sexual misconduct by titled players. What surprise me is that no chess commentator on youtube has made any comment on this. Does anyone know why?It makes a lot of sense, since Lichess ratings don't go below 600. So necessarily a sub 600 chess.com would still be at least 600 on Lichess (and the average difference is just smaller of course) The gap gets much smaller the higher your rating gets. I'm Lichess about 2000 & Chess.com about 1900.This can help you "translate" the different ratings. As you can see, 1250 Chesscom Blitz is roughly equal to 1460 Lichess Blitz, for example. On lichess you start at a higher elo so the entire player base has a higher average rating. different chess sites, different players, different way to measure the ratings and so on.This is perhaps less true now that Lichess has the "Insights" feature, but there may still be something to this. Scid will let you keep a personal database on your own computer, while Lichess stores all data on it's own servers. If something terrible happened to Lichess, everything on there would be gone, while you'd still have your database.. Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...Lichess's interface felt slicker when playing fast chess. In fact, on Lichess some players would play bullet at 15 seconds and 30 seconds time controls. Pretty wild. And on Lichess newer players like Penguin made their name. Carlsen played some tournaments on Lichess for fun and when he won he would donate the reward to the next tournament.Btw there was a reddit post some time back that listed every single paid feature on chess.com vs if its available on lichess for free. I think that the only thing that chess.com has over lichess is its bots which are customized to simulate playing styles of popular chess personalities. Those, too, are mostly unlocked with membership. The Chess Beginners Wiki is the perfect place to check out answers to these questions and more! The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, being a troll, and posting memes are not allowed.Not saying chess.com is hugely better necessarily, but defaulting the win to Lichess because of price is ridiculous. My take on the difference is: I like Lichess for the Study feature, and the opening explorer filtered certain rating ranges is very convenient (checking a couple quick lines is a lot smoother than battling with Chessbase).So e.g. level five is listed as 2000 rating. It lists the estimated Elo next to the username when you play a particular computer opponent. Stockfish level 2 is listed as 1100, level 3 I believe is 1400. Honestly, your post is surprising, because I'm a slightly higher ELO than you against humans (~1100), yet I can barely ever beat stockfish 3.5. unwettermaschine • 8 mo. ago. lichess uses a different rating system. I‘m not aware of the specifics myself but the initial rating for a new account on lichess is 1500, whereas on chess.com it‘s 1200 (or at least it was when I played there a long time ago). So yeah, lichess ratings are always going to be a few hundred points higher ... The rating system on lichess is an improvement on the one at chess.com. Chess.com uses Glicko, lichess uses Glicko 2 (electric bugaloo). I have made the switch to Lichess due to connectivity errors, but it seems a lot of your criticisms are plusses. Takebacks: mouse slips suck.Chess ratings are relative values, the number itself is completely meaningless, what matters is how your number compares to other players in the same player pool using the same rating system. You can compare ratings Lichess to Lichess or Chess.com to Chess.com for example, those numbers don't have any other meaning.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. lichess vs. chess.com. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment More posts you may like. r/Damnthatsinteresting • Kiyomasa the Gorilla, almost a teenager, reluctantly accepts a grooming session from his caring dad: unlike other apes and monkeys ...It's not exact for all the ratings, for exemple, some Grandmasters are 3000 or over on chess.com or lichess, and 2700 FIDE (because they can play rated games more often on chess.com and RD are not the same). The difference of ratings is also due to the fact that the average rating on lichess is 1500 and chess.com is 1000.Free Registration - both are equally good. Puzzles - lichess is better as chess dot com has a limitation on daily puzzles. Tournaments - lichess is better. Strength of players - Chess dot com seems to have stronger players. So, the ratings of an average player are lower compared to lichess.However, I'm currently sitting at ~1150 on chess.com and ~1850 on lichess for 5 minute blitz, which just seems absurd to me. Whenever this question is asked on this subreddit, I usually hear answers ranging from 2-300 rating inflation on Lichess compared to chess.com, but I've never heard of someone having a gap of almost 700 points.Chess.com PR Manager. • 2 yr. ago. There are many alternatives, but none offer anything similar to Game Report, which is a bundle of features unique to the game just played. Only Game Report includes Key Moments, Game Graph, Tactical Themes & Lessons, Move Descriptors (Mistake, Inaccuracy, Good Move, Blunder, etc.), Retry Moves and Accuracy ...Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...I think for these validated players - maybe pulling their historical lichess ratings and their historical FIDE ratings could help enlarge the sample size. AnnualUse9202 • 2 yr. ago. I like this analysis. My peak ratings: LiChess Blitz = 1953 * 0.9074 + 41.4256 = 1814. LiChess Rapid = 2075 * 0.7962 + 309.9946 = 1962.lichess - actual infinite analysis made by free engine for free, actual premoves. chesscom - analysis are total trash that even 1800 elo moves are often missed because of 15 depth which is like 0,05 seconds of thinking (still by the same free engine btw, so you pay for using free engine analysis of your game, you can simply download it btw, so this is more or …Oh and the difference between chesscom and lichess is ~250-300, lichess being higher. Your chess.com rating is actually pretty high for 1000 on Lichess. Most Lichess 1000s are around 500 on chess.com. Yes totally normal. Lichess is around 300 points higher than chess.com for low ratings.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. ... Lichess vs chess.com showing completely different moves. Related Topics . Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games . comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment .For each opening you can see number of games played, win rate, opponent's average elo and you can even see stats for all the variations of the opening. You can use it to analyze which openings you're good at, and which openings you can improve at. You can search for your friend's stats, or your favourite player's.Lichess has a better engine and it’s free. They both have the same variants, tournaments, and puzzles too. Chess.com has more variants, though they're not implemented particularly well. For most people, the difference between a depth 20 and depth 15 engine don't really matter that much.shanidshaan5678. May 24, 2021. 0. #1. In recent times chess has got flourished because of lockdown. most of the websites got the benefit of these, people are confused to choose chess.com and lichess both give support to chess study. which is the better one for get more benefit. Hamnder663. May 24, 2021. 0. #2.The clinic where she is interned has lost the chess pieces so we have decided to model our own game in cold porcelain. Next Sunday on our next visit we have to paint the black pieces. MiscellaneousThere's no incentive to being a Lichess patron for someone that's asking for subscriptions to help learn, which in this case would be chess.com learning resources / articles, or chess24's resources. (Just adding that I agree that you should be a Lichess patron if possible to support the site, and I recently became one as well.)A chess set contains 32 pieces, 16 pieces for each player. Each player has one king, one queen, two rooks, two bishops, two knights and eight pawns. In a Staunton chess set, half of the pieces are white and the other half are black.Chess ratings are relative values, the number itself is completely meaningless, what matters is how your number compares to other players in the same player pool using the same rating system. You can compare ratings Lichess to Lichess or Chess.com to Chess.com for example, those numbers don't have any other meaning.Lichess study engine is strongest. Lichess game engine is second. Then chess com game engine. The in tab stockfish boosted is the strongest but not worth waiting too long for stockfish to pick which move it likes the most. I had the lichess engines be more critical of my games and call more errors than the chess com did on the same gamesI just checked some of my old unrated games and no, they don't appear in the Lichess opening book - HOWEVER, they would exist in the downloadable full database via https://database.lichess.org. I wonder if Ding's team even knew how powerful and accessible the Lichess opening book is?Lichess is objectively the better platform. that being said if you're willing to spend money ches.com has some features you might enjoy and lichess don't have. tl;dr : if you're not wiling to spend money lichess is the best option if you're willing to spend money and want everything in the same place , chess.com probably is. if you're willing ...View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess > Chess.com. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best ... lichess good, fuck chess.com capitalist proprietary shit. lichess is open source.Chess.com vs Lichess Ratings. It seems to me there is a discrepancy of at least 200 points in the corresponding ratings, perhaps even more. Or there are some various psychological and other reasons for me playing much better blitz at lichess than at chess.com. At chess.com any 1600 rated opponent is tough as a nut, will fight you tooth and nail ...Lichess is superior due to the far greater amount of functions compared to chess.com's free version. Everything is free on lichess and I like the interface better. The only thing I will say is that I like that chess.com supports Swiss tournaments, which lichess does not (arena tournaments stress me out, and I don't like streaks or Berserk)..